Search for: "State v. Guy"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2009, 10:41 am
There are a lot of cases where the little guy made out all right, and where his success seems to be at least partly related to his little-guy-ness.For example, City of Willowbrook v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:47 pm
The exact language of 458:7(V) is: When either party has so treated the other as seriously to injure health or endanger reason. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:31 pm
It seems like I've been writing and speaking on Hunter v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
Whereas the prosecution's story -- and a pretty persuasive one at that -- was that the victim was a total stranger, and that defendant just went off on the guy for totally no reason.The fact that the defendant was in a seriously agitated state seems relevant, since it provides a fair piece of support to the prosecution's position that the defendant had a "problem" at the time and in that state decided to go off on a total stranger. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:47 am
In one of them, a guy with the firm questions the ethics of State Farm if the insurer was pressuring them to change engineers' reports. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
" Applying United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
Look at Hood's press release from when the settlement with State Farm was announced in January 2007, the settlement where he agreed not to prosecute the insurer:"After months of heated negotiations, I am happy to announce that our office has reached a settlement agreement with State Farm in our state court litigation,” said Attorney General Jim Hood. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:56 pm
US v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:13 am
United States, decided March 3. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:26 am
[I love a good policy argument as much as the next guy, but the court's jump to the policy argument seemed a little like repressed anger to me. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:55 am
"Absent fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances, an attorney is not liable to third parties not in privity or near-privity for harm caused by professional negligence" (Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d 370, 372; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:19 pm
But the basic scoop is that the defendant was charged with a crime, a bail bonding company posted his bail, the defendant skipped town, the guy was ultimately arrested and incarcerated in another state, and the LAPD ultimately went to Nebraska and extradited the guy and brought him back to Los Angeles. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:42 pm
You can summarize this opinion fairly easily:Give the guy back his weed.It's not illegal under state law, so the state can't keep (or destroy) it if he's not charged with a crime. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
” [Citations]; see also People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm
Precedent, she says, clearly holds that the statute of limitations on the crime of being "found" in the United States starts running when the defendant presents himself to a state officer. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:22 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
Stern v. [read post]
