Search for: "State v. HUMAN RELATIONS ETC."
Results 81 - 100
of 877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
As for the rest of it, we are left with a quandary: how can a challenge to the bedroom rules in the PRS be successful on the basis of Article 14, Sch 1, Human Rights Act 1998 (Burnip), but not the similar rules in relation to the social sector (MA)? [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:38 pm
Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
" Same language appears in the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA). [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:02 am
This information would include aspects relating to the nature, motive and impact of crime, culpability of convict etc. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:05 pm
More on Jesner from Amy Howe at SCOTUSBlog here and here; related on Kiobel in 2013 here, here, etc. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:32 am
The opinion at issue is Morrissey v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
John RobertsonWhole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
As for the rest of it, we are left with a quandary: how can a challenge to the bedroom rules in the PRS be successful on the basis of Article 14, Sch 1, Human Rights Act 1998 (Burnip), but not the similar rules in relation to the social sector (MA)? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Under the agreement, TDS provided various services (related to human resources, operations, marketing, etc.) and equipment to USCC, which in the most recent three years amounted to nearly $350 million in payments to TDS. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:54 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the United States Supreme Court overturned both Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
They looked at cases on the concept of “public authority” in the human rights context, such as Cameron v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:45 am
In other words, if State “A” is bound by treaty “1” with State “B”, and by treaty “2” with State “C”, “A” must apply treaty “1” in its relations with State “B” and treaty “2” in its relations with State “C”. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
(For an example of an appointment on the question of jurisdiction, see not only the Windsor case but also Hohn v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
Bring on the universal balm of human rights. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
judgment in the case of Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT [2014] EWHC 1666 (Pat) (22 May 2014). [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Starodubtsev, Russian University of Friendship of Peoples, MoscowAlexander Vylegzhanin, Moscow State Institute of International Relations [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 am
Entities exempted from the Act include (i) agencies, commissions, districts, etc. of the state or political subdivisions, (ii) nonprofits, (iii) higher education, (iv) national securities associations, (v) financial institutions or data subject to Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and (vi) hospitals as defined under Connecticut law. [read post]
27 May 2022, 7:49 am
Salesforce and A.B. v. [read post]
