Search for: "State v. Haar"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2009, 10:43 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:23 pm
Von Haar v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:00 pm
Von Haar v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
* Time for a Haar-cut - please do not relocate the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent OfficeIPKat’s good friend (nothing more) Merpel McKitten cast doubts on the idea to relocate the EPO’s Boards of Appeal to Haar (a municipality on the outskirts of Munich). [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:37 am
Haar (2d Cir. 2001) (holding, before the TDRA increased the fame standard, that trademark holder’s annual sales of $280 million were not enough to constitute fame); Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
*** PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE ***Never Too Late 123 [week ending on Sunday 20 November] | Time for a Haar-cut - please do not relocate the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office | Remember the House Ban? [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am
It is then fitting that the Office President did not come to the inauguration of the new building of the Boards of Appeal in Haar, but instead sent his VP Mr. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
Haar Commc’ns. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am
" Law Research Serv., Inc. v Crook, 36 AD2d 912, 912 (1st Dept 1971)(no long-arm jurisdiction over out-of-state attorney whose only connection to the state is that he hired New York attorney to represent his client in a Texas proceeding).This situation is markedly different from other cases finding jurisdiction based on the engagement of a New York lawyer or law firm by an out-of-state entity. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The first was on The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will need to… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
It is the combination of the ‘re-emergence of the state’ from out of the shadows of multilateralism and international governance, a growing discontent and backlash from multiple sectors of society directed against existing international norms and institutions and the limited ability of the latter to address serious contemporary problems, which generate a sense of crisis and a possible plunge towards world disorder (Although, it may also be claimed that… [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
