Search for: "State v. Hale"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
The more recent development of that approach by Hale LJ in Eagle v Chambers [2003] EWCA Civ was also cited approvingly by the Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
Goodyear v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:59 am
The post Case Comment – Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:47 pm
The Fourth Circuit in a brief, unpublished opinion, United States of America v Mohammad-Omar, April 27, 2009, affirmed the conviction of a defendant for conduct which occurred entirely outside the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:11 am
These Regulations enable civil proceedings in UK courts for breaches of the EC Regulations, and state that compensation awarded may include sums for injury to feelings. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm
A traditional trust is not a distinct legal entity at all, but rather a “fiduciary relationship” that could not be haled into court. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
As for the competing Convention rights (the family’s Article 8 rights to privacy and the importance of free press reporting under Article 10), the judge relied upon the ruling of the Supreme Court in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2016] UKSC 2) where Lady Hale observed: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am
The inviolability of documents which are part of a mission archive under arts 24 and 27(2) of the VCDR makes it impermissible to use such documents (or copies) in a domestic court of the host country, absent extraordinary circumstances such as state security, or express waiver from the mission state. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 2:34 am
Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment, with which the other justices agreed. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Lady Hale also agreed that the Court in Bressol did not accept the A-G’s reasoning. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Lady Hale at [99] noted that whilst the court would not always take the government’s word for it, foreign policy and national security were government business. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:46 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Heather Hale v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 1:40 pm
be2 LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:36 am
A majority of the Supreme Court (Lady Hale dissenting) dismissed the appeal. [read post]
