Search for: "State v. Hale"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
D. and A. v United Kingdom 32949/17 34614/17 The Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissenting) found justified discrimination in imposing the bedroom tax on a woman who, as a result of domestic violence, had had her home treated under the Sanctuary Scheme to include the modification of the attic to render it a “panic room”. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
The Secretary of State appealed to the Upper Tribunal. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:27 am
Lady Hale and Lord Kerr both gave dissenting judgments (Lady Hale as to outcome, though she agreed with Lord Wilson on the relevant legal principles to be applied; Lord Kerr dissented both on outcome and on the legal approach taken, specifically on the relevant test to be applied by the courts when considering the proportionality of a measure; though both agreed with certain parts of Lord Wilson’s judgment). [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
Lady Hale set out the terms of the reference to the court and stated in the view of the court, the principled solution to the case would be to treat the care component of DLA as an invalidity benefit for the purpose of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 5:34 am
Other thoughts on the FTC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm
Shellee Hale, in which a blogger sought to use the state’s reporter shield law to enable her to refuse to reveal the source of information she posted on an internet message board. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:24 am
Rivers v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm
They asked the Court to declare that one state cannot be haled into the courts of another state to answer for its official actions back home. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
(See Hale, supra, 183 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1383-1384; see generally Adams v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
Oral Argument Preview In Atkins v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:11 pm
” The out-of-state defendant must “purposefully avail itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state,” thus creating a substantial connection with the forum state. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
For example, in the recent case of Kasten v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
Supreme Court In a leapfrog appeal, the Supreme Court, comprising Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Sumption, Hughes and Toulson, heard submissions on 26 and 27 January 2016. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
The majority In her judgment Lady Hale considered the developments that had taken place since the decision in Briody and the current state of the law in relation to surrogacy. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:47 am
Lefkow was also threatened by a New Jersey blogger over the Hale case; federal and state cases are pending against that blogger for other threats.) [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:47 am
Lefkow was also threatened by a New Jersey blogger over the Hale case; federal and state cases are pending against that blogger for other threats.) [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
The case was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:57 am
* United States v. [read post]
