Search for: "State v. Hale"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
Stott) and jurisprudence from the ECtHR, and Lord Kerr and Lady Hale despite dissenting overall agreed with Lord Wilson on the status issue. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Starting on Monday 30 January 2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:04 am
State: The CCA granted the defendant's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this burglary of a habitation case out of Hale County on the following issues:1. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:51 am
(quoting Largoza v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
On Wednesday, CAAF will hear United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:34 am
The panel consisted of Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
At the outset, Lady Hale said that an anonymity order would be made in B’s case. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:14 am
In giving the only judgment Lady Hale stated that no enquiries were made to assess the practicability of moving the family to Bletchley or as to the children’s needs, subject to the Children’s Act 2004, s 11(2). [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:05 am
Kowaleski v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:40 am
JPMorgan Chase Bank, armed with six partners at two AmLaw 100 firms (Wilmer Hale and McGuire Woods) took the truly unusual step of filing an objection to an amicus curiae brief I filed in a 9th Circuit case called McShannock v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
However, art 51 limits the CFR’s application to “only when” member states “are implementing Union Law”. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am
This definition is lifted directly from Council Directive 98/59/EC on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (the “Collective Redundancy Directive”). [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
However, there is no shortage of cases in which such appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the original requests for payment did not constitute “claims” under the CDA.One recent illustration of this problem involved the distinction between routine and non-routine requests for payment, as addressed by a recent split-panel decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Parsons Global Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
The much-anticipated judgment in MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64 has now been delivered by the Privy Council, and the decision was not as all had expected. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
Entertainment Merchants, concerning a State's ability to restrict the sale of violent video games to minors and the First Amendment right to free speech; Snyder v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Eagle v Chambers The reference to Eagle v Chambers (above) is of particular interest of course because the judgment of the Court of Appeal in that case was delivered by Lady Justice Hale (as she then was). [read post]
