Search for: "State v. Hallock"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2023, 9:34 pm
A settlement agreement signed by an attorney may bind a client even where it exceeds the attorney's actual authority, if the attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; Popovic v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:34 pm
A settlement agreement signed by an attorney may bind a client even where it exceeds the attorney's actual authority, if the attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; Popovic v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:33 am
State of New York and in Charlop v A.O. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
" The court explained that the stipulation signed by Nobile and the attorney acting on behalf of DOE is binding under general contract principles, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, as Nobile failed to show that there was fraud, collusion, mistake or accident with respect to the execution of the settlement by Nobile, or that DOE's counsel lacked DOE's consent to enter into the stipulation. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
" The court explained that the stipulation signed by Nobile and the attorney acting on behalf of DOE is binding under general contract principles, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, as Nobile failed to show that there was fraud, collusion, mistake or accident with respect to the execution of the settlement by Nobile, or that DOE's counsel lacked DOE's consent to enter into the stipulation. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:37 am
(See Hallock v State of New York, supra; Kelley v Chavez, 33 AD3d 590 [2006]; Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:33 am
In the words of the court, “[s]tipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and not lightly cast aside,” citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:48 pm
Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 119 (1940). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:11 am
” Hallock v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:01 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Michael’s Constr. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
Billingsley and Owsley v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
Billingsley and Owsley v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
Bonnette v Long Island College Hosp., 3 NY3d 281 (2004); Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 (1984). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
In 1876, lawyer and legal publisher Carl Jahn published the first issue of the Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin, a precursor of the Ohio State Bar Journal, and solicited Ohio lawyers to submit “law points of general interest. [read post]
