Search for: "State v. Halsey"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 1:00 am
Daniel Deak (Corvinus University of Budapest) has posted several tax papers on SSRN: Illegal State Aid and Harmful Tax Competition: The Case of Hungary Legal Autopoiesis Theory in Operation -- A Study of Marks & Spencer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:10 am
Cir. 2022) appeared first on Staas & Halsey LLP. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:07 am
., v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:06 am
Garner II, Partner In a June 21, 2021 opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:56 pm
This issue was discussed in Withrow v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
In Wright v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:53 pm
In Withrow v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:35 am
Thus the Court granted in part and denied in part the Defendants’ motion for reconsideration of the August 19, 2014 order. 545 Halsey Lane Properties v Town of Southampton, 2015 WL 1565487 (EDNY 4/8/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Immunity [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:47 pm
Therefore, the Court dismissed the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint. 545 Halsey Lane Properties v Town of Southampton, 2014 WL 4100952 (EDNY 8/19/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Due Process, Equal Protection, Uncategorized [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
(citing Siegel v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:25 am
[Note: In State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm
Halsey Drug Co., 160 A.D.2d 305, 553 N.Y.S.2d 724, 726 (1990)). [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm
Halsey Drug Co., 160 A.D.2d 305, 553 N.Y.S.2d 724, 726 (1990)). [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm
Halsey Drug Co., 160 A.D.2d 305, 553 N.Y.S.2d 724, 726 (1990)). [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 5:33 am
” Safe Harbor Retreat, LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:49 pm
Halsey. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 638 F. 2d 605, 610 (3d Cir. 1980); andnbsp;Jaksich, 582 F. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
The response explained the late filing of the answer by stating that, on the day the answer was due, Respondents' counsel was delayed in returning to his office from a hearing. [read post]
