Search for: "State v. Harbison" Results 21 - 40 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Federal Community Defender Organization of Philadelphia 15-491 Issue: Whether Congress has created a right to federally funded counsel in state capital post-conviction proceedings, in state court, prior to completing federal habeas litigation, notwithstanding this Court’s contrary decision in Harbison v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Federal Community Defender Organization of Philadelphia 15-491Issue: Whether Congress has created a right to federally funded counsel in state capital post-conviction proceedings, in state court, prior to completing federal habeas litigation, notwithstanding this Court’s contrary decision in Harbison v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Federal Community Defender Organization of Philadelphia 15-491 Issue: Whether Congress has created a right to federally funded counsel in state capital post-conviction proceedings, in state court, prior to completing federal habeas litigation, notwithstanding this Court’s contrary decision in Harbison v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Illinois lawyer Shawn Collins of The Collins Law Firm on the firm’s blog, Pollution Law Watch “Consent” in the Wake of State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Philadelphia lawyer Rick Jones of Dechert on the firm’s blog, Crunched Credit Bitcoin and the Like: Tax Considerations – Denver lawyer Ashley Dietrich of BakerHostetler on the firm’s blog, WealthDirector SEC Cracks Down On Confidentiality Agreements Chilling Employees’ Rights to Report Potential Securities Law Violations – Ada Dolph, Christopher Robertson, and Robert Milligan  of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Trading Secrets 10… [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:39 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Chicago lawyer Kenneth Dolin of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s Employer Labor Relations Blog Waiting for Claim Assignment Doesn’t Toll Statute of Limitations: American Family v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Matter of Town of Islip v Caviglia delineates the proper balance between community needs and free expression under our Constitution in this state. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Princeton, NJ lawyer Elizabeth Litten of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog, HIPAA, HITECH & HIT State of Minnesota’s DWI Test Refusal Law In Flux – Roseville, MN attorney Daniel Koewler of Ramsay Law Firm on the firm’s blog, Minnesota DWI Defense Rebranding in Professional Sports: The Good, Sporting Kansas City – Nashville lawyer Kevin Hartley of Stites & Harbison on the firm’s blog, Trademarkology… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Roseville, MN attorney Daniel Koewler of Ramsay Law Firm on the firm’s blog, Minnesota DWI Defense Reaping What You Sow – City of Dallas Sued by Trinity East Energy – Dallas lawyer Charles Sartain of Looper Reed & McGraw on Energy And The Law The Lesson of EEOC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by TJ McIntyre
  Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
This exact scenario was illustrated in a recent decision in Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
Roper, 11-5005, in which the habeas petitioner claims that (1) under Harbison v. [read post]