Search for: "State v. Harlan" Results 221 - 240 of 664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 am
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, did say this in a footnote:The dissent asserts that our position "resembles" Justice Harlan's dissent in Miranda v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 11:27 am by Mark Tushnet
United States endorsed Harlan's view.In 1972 we were given to understand that this had been an abuse of the law clerk's role. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
Sandford, the 1857 ruling that upheld slavery even in the free states, and Plessy v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
Sandford, the 1857 ruling that upheld slavery even in the free states, and Plessy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Samuel Bray
Professor Harrison's work was recently highlighted by Professor Amanda Frost at SCOTUSBlog as one side of a debate critical to United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:26 pm
Thus, for example, the Sixth Circuit, in an opinion authored by Justice Harlan, applied the rule to state statutes. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
General Counsel for Tiffany, Leigh Harlan, stated that “We believe this decision further validates the strength and value of the Tiffany mark and reinforces our continuing efforts to protect the brand. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He speculated that Harlan would have joined the Alito opinion in the NASA case, and that Harlan would have dissented when the Supreme Court, in the decision last year in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Stephen Griffin
  The conference is viewable on YouTube.The sequencing problem is related to an originalist argument advanced by Justice Harlan in dissent in Reynolds v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 9:52 pm by Josh Blackman
The only dissenter in Plessy was Justice John Marshall Harlan. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:42 pm
Paul Co., 787 A.2d 376 (Pa. 2001) and the decision of the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas in Harlan v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:06 am by Brando Simeo Starkey
  The Intent Doctrine should be traced back to Charley Smith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm by Joseph Fishkin
  Justice Harlan was dissenting from the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
This assessment parallels the reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test articulated by Justice Harlan in Katz v. [read post]