Search for: "State v. Harp" Results 21 - 40 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2017, 3:55 pm by Sam Turco
This is the background in the case of Kountze v Domina Law Group decided by the Nebraska Court of Appeals. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:55 pm by Sam Turco
This is the background in the case of Kountze v Domina Law Group decided by the Nebraska Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Tyrrell and Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In my view, harping on about the size of the award in Leech has the capacity to undermine the case for reform of damages awards. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 11:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Tomorrow the Supreme Court wil formally issue its mandate to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit based on last month's landmark decision in Apple v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm by Giles Peaker
On the engagement of Art 8, Kugathas v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31 was followed, per Seldley LJ: “Mr. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in Hauck, states at the referred to passage (emphasis added):99. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 7:10 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to include evidence — Guilty plea by someone else Andrea Sheron Harps, the appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Harford County of manufacture of marijuana, possession with intent to distribute marijuana, and possession of marijuana. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am by Lyle Denniston
”   And he quickly brought up a prior precedent (South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
 Weiner harps on the fact that FRAP 35 identifies the creation of a circuit split as one possible reason a given case may present a question of “exceptional importance. [read post]