Search for: "State v. Harp"
Results 101 - 107
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
In Righthaven LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
” And even as far back as Gibbons v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:41 am
Not to harp on law, but as the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Fayed v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Take another example: the Clean Power Plan overturned by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
