Search for: "State v. Harsh"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,662
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 3:35 am
The November argument was in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 7:19 am
The relevant factors in cases like this are found in Cuffy v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 5:09 am
In Wilkow v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:05 am
Meanwhile, although it opposed what it likely saw as officious intermeddling by the state plaintiffs in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm
Gray v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 11:18 am
Three dozen U.S. states are also suing Google over its Google Play practices. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:23 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:03 pm
Chernomordik v Ocean Sand Development, LLC, decided earlier this month by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, presents one of the more intriguing examples of a dissolution case highlighting the centrality of the purpose clause in a realty holding LLC’s operating agreement. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 10:57 am
See State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Mezey v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 5:55 am
Some faced harsh prison sentences. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:14 pm
To further put it succinctly, this mandate was reflected even in the judiciary’s judgment in various cases, most significantly in Chang Liang Sang & Ors v Public Prosecutor [1982] 2 MLJ 231:other than in the most exceptional circumstances, a sentence of death should be imposed following a conviction for trafficking, in order to mark the gravity of the offence, to emphasise public disapproval, to serve as a warning to others, to punish the offender and most of all the protect the… [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:07 am
Here is the opinion: Vindman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:15 pm
“ ‘[T]he mistaken or erroneous issuance of a permit does not estop a municipality from correcting errors, even where there are harsh results’, ” (Matter of Astoria Landing, Inc. v New York City Envtl. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:17 am
The new implied discretion could not apply to non-UK citizens, nor foreign states. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:48 pm
ShareOn Tuesday, the court heard argument in Jones v. [read post]
