Search for: "State v. Hartley" Results 121 - 140 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
There was some debate about whether or not the tree was jointly owned, since its base was across the boundary by about 9 centimetres, but the judge opted to follow Hartley and use the trunk as the defining issue. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Long before enactment of the BCL, New York’s highest court held in Darcy v Brooklyn & N.Y. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
” Looking to the history of the NLRA’s enactment, the court noted that the limitations period in Sec. 10(b) was the focus of significant attention when it was introduced as part of the Taft-Hartley Amendments in 1947. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am by Rob Robinson
Potentially, a Lot of Permutations – eDiscovery Best Practices http://bit.ly/UExXjZ (Doug Austin) When It Comes to eDiscovery, Leave the Driving to Us – http://bit.ly/UyyTWW (Bob Ambrogi) Where There’s Smoke There’s Fire: Powering eDiscovery with Data Loss Prevention – http://bit.ly/XyQTqj (Allison Walton) Without Request, Delaware State Judge Orders Use of Predictive Coding in Complex Case – http://bit.ly/Xn4VLB (Robert Hilson) Why is Legal Hold Still a… [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 2:13 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
It will be argued that the Hartley–Dogauchi Report’s interpretative approach has much to commend it as it follows the path of least resistance by narrowly construing the right to sue in a non-chosen forum as an exception rather than the norm. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Consistently with its reasoning in Gasser (Case C-116/02) and Turner v Grovit (Case C-259/02), the Court held in West Tankers that “even though proceedings [to enforce an arbitration agreement via an anti-suit injunction] do not come within the scope of [the Brussels I Regulation], they may nevertheless have consequences which undermine its effectiveness”, if they “prevent a court of another Member State from exercising the jurisdiction conferred on it by [the… [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am by Chukwuma Okoli
[28] Secondly, it must be stated that Nigerian courts are able to decline jurisdiction, when called upon to hear a case, if upon considering all relevant factors, they form the view that another forum exists with jurisdiction and is the more appropriate forum.[29] However, when a judgment is brought for recognition in Nigeria, Nigerian court [read post]