Search for: "State v. Haze"
Results 61 - 80
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
See, e.g., Haze v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, a case involving a tenured State employee, the Court of Appeals said the employer could threaten the employee with disciplinary action if he or she did not resign. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 1:06 pm
Buffalo Field Campaign v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:53 am
See Seitz v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
PCAOB, Seila Law v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
United States Courts. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 2:57 am
In Not Feeling Minnesota: Court Of Appeals Of Minnesota Makes Nonsensical Rule 609(b) Rulings In Criminal Sexual Conduct Case posted at EvidenceProf Blog, we get a discussion about the felony impeachment ruling by the Court of Appeals of Minnesota in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
They follow, and do not lead, state courts. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
We get slivers of clarity, and then this space/haze around the rights. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:18 am
Nub’s” conduct was sexual harassment as opposed to hazing. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:58 am
This has been considered by the UK Court of Appeal to potentially apply to performances by deceased artists in the case of Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd (which dealt with performances by the late Jimi Hendrix). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Since SCOTUS does not like making ridiculous policy, I suspect that they will Grutter-ize the Second Amendment – i.e., declare gun ownership to be a fundamental right that states cannot infringe without a really good reason but then allow states to regulate it all the same just so long as they are not too candid about it and undergo some ritual hazing by a federal judge to determine if their grounds for regulation are the least intrusive means for a blah, blah, blah.… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
Along with many others, today I find myself emerging from an Olympic haze. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 8:04 am
New to the list of risks facing high education policyholders are the potential implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions, including New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:50 am
Held v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
