Search for: "State v. Hearst"
Results 1 - 20
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
Powell, Hearst Publications, Skidmore v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:48 pm
Aquino v. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
She sues Hearst Communications for violating the Illinois Right of Publicity Act. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:38 am
For example, in Xuedan Wang v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Finally, " 'in order to prevent [the amended] judgment which is unreviewable for mootness from spawning any legal consequences or precedent,' " we vacate the amended judgment (Matter of Thrall v CNY Centro, Inc., 89 AD3d 1449, 1451 [4th Dept 2011], lv dismissed 19 NY3d 898 [2012], quoting Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 718 [1980]; see Funderburke v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Finally, " 'in order to prevent [the amended] judgment which is unreviewable for mootness from spawning any legal consequences or precedent,' " we vacate the amended judgment (Matter of Thrall v CNY Centro, Inc., 89 AD3d 1449, 1451 [4th Dept 2011], lv dismissed 19 NY3d 898 [2012], quoting Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 718 [1980]; see Funderburke v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am
If so, please state when and where. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 1:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:05 am
From today's Eighth Circuit decision in Nunes v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:28 am
Hearst took websites to the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
Donna and Dan have the same current mental state: They both know about the reversal. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the petition which sought to compel disclosure of the documents sought in Plaintiff's FOIL requests that were the subject of this appeal. * New York State Public Officers Law Article 6. ** See Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454.*** The basic concept underlying FOIL is that all government documents and records, other than those having access specifically limited… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Q: Are social media companies “state actors”? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:18 pm
State). [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
Nicklin J ruled that the meaning of Murray’s tweet was that Riley “had publicly stated in a tweet that he [Mr Corbyn] deserved to be violently attacked”. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
