Search for: "State v. Hearst"
Results 41 - 60
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 9:37 am
Ferrell therefore fails to state a claim for defamation. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:29 pm
Abbott & Kristen Kortick South of Market Community Action Network v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:46 am
Since then, the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
In 2013, he obtained a restraining order against some of the authors in New York state court. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:17 am
Feb. 18, 2014) King v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Levay v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:28 am
Hearst took websites to the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:45 am
Financial investment data concerning public official's spouse subject to disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Humane Socy. of United States v Fanslau, 2008 NY Slip Op 06681, Decided on August 28, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, the Court of Appeals said that there is a presumption that all government and agency records are open for public inspection unless the… [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
Powell, Hearst Publications, Skidmore v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am
The ruling came in three similar putative class actions that alleged Bauer Publishing Co., Hearst Communications, Inc, and Time, Inc., respectively, sold their customers’ personal information without permission. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:37 am
Hearst BRONX COUNTYInsurance LawCourt Denies Reargument, Adheres to Prior Decision Denying Plaintiff Request to Join MVAIC Mejia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Q: Are social media companies “state actors”? [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:12 am
Hearst Communications, Inc., 12-CV-0733 (C.D. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
In Wang v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 11:43 am
To establish liability for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiffs were required to show that the defendant's conduct was "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency" (Ruggiero v Contemporary Shells, 160 AD2d 986, 987; see Freihofer v Hearst Corp., 65 NY2d 135, 143). [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:29 pm
In UMG v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:10 am
Oral argument in Kennedy v. [read post]
