Search for: "State v. Hein" Results 61 - 80 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2008, 8:01 pm
         Photo of Lionel Messi in his Argentina kit from the Guardian: CAS steps in to stop players heading to Beijing.The Yale Law Library has quite a few resources pertaining to the Court of Arbitration for sport such as:The proceedings before the Court of Arbitration for Sport -  2006 Conference - K3702 .P36 2007The Court of Arbitration for Sport, 1984 - 2006 - K3702 .C686 2006Arbitraje deportivo - K3702… [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:54 am by Kristen Matteucci
You can also use Hein’s Advanced Search function to search for her name as an author. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 2:50 am
The second discusses the Supreme Court's decisions in Hein v Freedom from Religion Foundation, 551 U.S. ____ (2007) (June 25, 2007) and University of Notre Dame v Laskowski, No. 06-582 (US June 29, 2007) (cert. granted, judgment vacated and remanded in light of Hein). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
I know from previous postings on SLAW that some Toronto law firms are considering subscribing to Hein. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
Cuno, a 2006 case that held state taxpayer suits in federal court must meet the same criteria as federal taxpayer suits, and Hein v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:14 am
Last year, Parents Involved (206), Hein (117), Ledbetter (184), Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine & Underberg, 88 AD2d 547, 548 [1st Dept 1982]; see Matter of Jacob D. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm by Conor McEvily
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Daugaard v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 3:41 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The confusion of holding and dicta makes correctly deciding future cases more difficult, when judges are looking back for precedents.This complaint is not a new one; a 1911 Yale Law Journal article discussed factors that were "swelling the length of appellate opinions," and more recent law review articles have conducted empirical examinations of the length of state and U.S. supreme court opinions (all links are to Hein, subscription required). [read post]