Search for: "State v. Hepburn" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Hepburn, an 1813 decision by the United States Supreme Court that kept a woman and her daughter enslaved by blocking evidence that one of their ancestors had been free. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
They had a soon together, Luca Andrea, who was born in 1970.The IPKat has already reported on a case brought jointly by Luca Andrea Dotti and Audrey Hepburn's other son, Sean Hepburn Ferrer, and decided by the Court of First Instance of Milan in 2015 concerning unauthorized evocation (not even direct use) of the likeness of Audrey Hepburn in an advertisement. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Hepburn, which is forthcoming in the Supreme Court Review:The American hearsay rule took its modern form in Queen v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:24 am by Simon Lester
Jarrod Hepburn explains: As discussed in a companion article, a tribunal at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has found one discrete breach of the Spain-Argentina bilateral investment treaty, but awarded no damages, in the case of Urbaser SA and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:46 am
Tallinn Manual 2.0 on Cyberoperations and Subsequent State Practice Jarrod Hepburn, Domestic Investment Statutes In International Law International DecisionsJacquelene Mwangi, Francis Karioko Muruatetu v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
The paper builds on Siegel 1984 to argue that, by indicating in Smyth v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:28 am by James R. Marsh
Recently this issue has come to a head in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in two cases, In re Amy Unknown, No. 09-41238, and United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:11 pm
” Jarrod Hepburn, Comparative Public Law at the Dawn of Investment Treaty Arbitration: Saar Papier Vertriebs GmbH v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]