Search for: "State v. High"
Results 1 - 20
of 35,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
For example, state law might grant a high-ranking official like the director of the state department of transportation broad responsibility for the state highway system that, in context, includes authority to make official announcements on that subject. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm
, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 11:22 am
Kaercher v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:48 am
" United States v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
The 7.3 is a V8, which means it has eight cylinders in a V formation — the most common layout for eight-cylinder engines. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:38 am
The group walked us through inventorship determination examples for AI-assisted inventions based on factors borrowed from Pannu v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule V drugs are generally used for antidiarrheal, antitussive, and analgesic purposes. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:25 pm
See page 107 of FDA’s 1st Quarter FY2024 MDUVA V Report (here). [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:22 pm
In SIA v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:20 pm
Green v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or… [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:08 am
Diaz v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:11 am
” O’Brien v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
From Pryor v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 7:58 pm
In Butler v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:57 pm
Next, in Dobbs v. [read post]