Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1 - 20 of 8,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:07 am by Candace Milner
Holder decision of 2013 gutted a key tool used to ensure state voting laws do not violate the VRA. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
EU Member States are required to designate one or more competent supervisory authority(ies) to enforce Data Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
Another is Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484, 10 N.Y.S.3d 2 [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
In advance of the Sporting Chance Forum, part of the United Nations’ yearlongcommemoration of the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders call on States, international sports associations, sportspersons, and other stakeholders to protect and respect international human rights law and standards in the field of sports, without discrimination of any kind. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:55 am by Unknown
By Suzanne CosgroveKalshiEX LLC, a regulated designated contract market that offers event contracts, sued the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in federal court Wednesday, challenging the Commission’s September 2023 order that prohibits Kalshi from listing its controversial Congressional Control Contracts (KalshiEX LLC v. [read post]
This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:49 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
For instance, Article 7 instructively highlights that states must “consult and take into account the self-expressed needs, knowledge, expertise and perspectives of rights holders,” and “guarantee effective and institutionalized public participation and deliberation mechanisms which are accessible to everyone, in order to meet its human rights obligation of respecting and ensuring meaningful and effective participation. [read post]