Search for: "State v. Hong" Results 81 - 100 of 898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm by Matthew Nied
For example, if a person in Hong Kong were to create an allegedly defamatory website, an Ontario court would have presumptive jurisdiction over an action brought by the plaintiff against the person in Hong Kong if the plaintiff demonstrated that at least one other person in Ontario viewed the website. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:54 am by Chris Neumeyer
Montgomery Ward, the court found U.S. sales despite delivery in Hong Kong, because the supplier manufactured the goods with North American electrical fittings, affixed U.S. trademarks on the goods, and stated U.S. destinations on the invoices. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
 Hong Kong amended its Patent Ordinance, June 27, 1997 and on February 22, 2008. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:29 am by John J Downes
On 8 April T wrote to L stating that some of the itinerary had been changed but that the Hong Kong stopover may still take place. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:17 pm by Pamela Pengelley
London School of Economics (winner) Tbilisi State University v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
  Philip Devenish & Odysseas G Repousis, CEAC v Montenegro: When does an investor have a ‘seat’ in its home state? [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
  Pill LJ pointed out that, in an analysis of the law of fair comment in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal case of Tse Wai Chun Pau v Albert Cheng ([2001] EMLR 31), Lord Nicholls had said “the comment must explicitly or implicitly indicate, at least in general terms, what are the facts on which the comment is being made. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:05 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HM Revenue & Customs v London Clubs Management Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1323 (18 November 2011) San Michael College Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1336 (18 November 2011) Bethell Construction Ltd & Anor v Deloitte and Touche [2011] EWCA Civ 1321 (18 November 2011) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1333 (18 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Medhanye, R… [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
The order was placed and paid for through the seller's English website and the watch was posted to him from Hong Kong. [read post]