Search for: "State v. Hooper"
Results 121 - 140
of 176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
On Tuesday 7 February 2012 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Hooper and Toulson LJJ) heard the appeal in R (Gu [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
On the same date Hooper LJ dismissed the oral application for permission to appeal against the decision of Sharp J in the case of Diwany v The Ministry of Justice and the Police Norway ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)). [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: "Bradley Manning’s Defense Attorney Looks to Blame Military for Leaks" reports @KimZetter for @wired http://pjblack.me/vWsFIt good call i think: "Tom Hooper rejects 3D for Les Miserables movie" http://pjblack.me/uot7gV i doubt mitt romney would really want this enforsement: "Dan Quayle to Endorse Mitt Romney" Image by Dave Delay via Flickr … [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
Hooper v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am
Lord Justice Hooper adopted Mr Justice Baker’s reasoning as to why this was a special case. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
In the years after the Court of Appeals decision in Stith three of the four Appellate Departments have issued rulings counter to the Stith holding, concluding that because it is the defendant's initial burden to establish standing, the People may raise defendant's lack of standing for the first time on appeal (see People v McCall, 51 AD3d 822, 822 [2d Dept 2008] lv denied 11 NY3d 856 [2008]; People v Hooper, 245 AD2d 1020, 1021 [4th Dept 1997]; People v… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Hooper Jr. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
" We're talking Starbucks Corporation v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
The Divisional Court thought so in Hooper v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
R (on the Application of AC) v Bershire West Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 247 – Read judgment. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
In Rodrigues v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
The Article 8 rights of sex offenders, David Hooper, RPC Privacy Blog, 24 February 2011. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
The appeal was listed for 28 February or 1 March 2011 before the Master of the Rolls, Sedley and Hooper LJJ. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:54 pm
That was a misreading of the judgment of Lord Hope in Secretary of State for Justice v James [2009] UKHL 22, in which the court decided that Article 5(4) did not require the Secretary of State to assist a detainee in putting forward his best possible case for release at parole hearings. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Hooper, 50 S.W.3d 463, 470 (Tenn. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Jonathan Djanogly, replied for the Government. [read post]
