Search for: "State v. Hopper" Results 101 - 116 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Case by case v. systematic: the cost of false positives and false negatives; court doesn’t consider the long-run consequences, like Boston Hockey or post-sale confusion. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Beck, et al.
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Satya Marar
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm by Stephen Jenei
This scenario is frequently triggered by a “grass-hopper” (a term coined by Chief Judge Randall Rader of the CAFC), which refers to entities that leap in and practice an invention, knowing that the patent holder can do nothing about it. [read post]