Search for: "State v. Howell" Results 561 - 580 of 626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services601 East 12th Street - Room 248Kansas City, MO 64106Voice Phone (816)426-7277FAX (816)426-3686TDD (816)426-7065Region VIII - Denver (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming)Velveta Howell, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
The opinion follows the standard adopted by the Ninth Circuit court in Witt v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 6:48 pm
” One of the leading cases on implied copyright licenses is Effects Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC head an application in the case of Howell v Airbnb UK Ltd and gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Lukas Gemar
Glicksman of the George Washington Law School argue that the Court’s decision in Lucia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Beryl Howell suggested federal prosecutors were being too lenient in their handling of cases stemming from the storming of the Capitol as lawmakers were convening on January 6 to certify Joe Biden’s victory in the presidential race. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Because, the agreements were not negotiated at arms’ length they could not be enforced (Sarceno v Choi, September 5, 2014, Howell, B). [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
The North Carolina Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for those with cerebral palsy within the State of North Carolina. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]