Search for: "State v. Howell" Results 581 - 600 of 626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Zappala's statement more than 15 years ago in the case of Howell v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:06 pm by Paul Levy
Consequently, I think it is fair to say that although judges do insist on the provision of supporting affidavits in the file-sharing cases, they tend to accept some fairly superficial proofs in those affidavit, culminating in Judge Beryl Howell’s ruling in Call of the Wild Movie v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
China: (IPKat),Progress in collecting karaoke royalties: (IP Dragon)EuropeSir Nicholas Pumphrey 1957-2007: (IPKat), (ipeg), (IPFactor), OHIM decision renders Crocs' foam clog Registered European Community Design invalid: (Washington State Patent Law Blog),UK dentist firm beats Lacoste in trade mark dispute: (IPKat), (IP Factor),Patent Trolls statistics, will Europe escape the trolls? [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
  In an article in the Harvard Business Law Review, Howell E. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
Kelly; Chief Judge Beryl Howell (orally, commemorated in a minute entry); John D. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:40 pm by Tiana Garbett and James Gatto
Howell affirmed, “[i]n the absence of any human involvement in the creation of the work, the clear and straightforward answer is the one given by the Register: No. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the District Court, the case is titled only “Sealed v. [read post]