Search for: "State v. Humphrey" Results 141 - 160 of 553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Jody Coultas
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision to dismiss an attorney’s challenge of his bar license suspension as the attorney’s procedural and substantive challenges to the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s disciplinary proceeding were rejected (Piccone v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Pamela C. Maloney
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a summary order affirming the district court’s judgment (Oneida Indian Nation v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Mr Humphreys will present on relevant case law, and a panel of Stockholm-based legal professionals will comment on the relevant impact on EU and Swedish trademark practice. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
We opted not to include Myers and Humphrey's Executor; Morrison covers those issues well. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am by Cameron Malone-Brown
Cameron Malone-BrownOn 16 October 2019, the long-awaited opinion of Advocate General Tanchev was handed down in the case of Sky Plc & Ots v SkyKick UK Ltd & Anr (Case C-371/18). [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am by Lyle Denniston
That sturdy precedent was the Court’s decision in the case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:09 am by John Elwood
Humphrey dismissals without prejudice are strikes under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am by Jeffrey H. Brochin
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:44 am by Thomas Long
The appellate court reversed a district court’s denial of the German company’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and remanded with instructions that the case be dismissed (C5 Medical Werks, LLC v. [read post]