Search for: "State v. Hunter" Results 341 - 360 of 1,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am by INFORRM
  The Supreme Court of Canada has held that s.8 affords constitutional protection of a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy (see: Hunter v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
Prosecutors also alleged that Hunter used campaign funds to pay for certain activities with a woman identified as “Individual 14,” as well as Female Individuals 15–18, none of whom were his wife (and co-defendant) Margaret Hunter. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am by Brian Shiffrin
Only the Appellate Division, First Department (People v Graham, 211 AD2d 55, 57-58 [1st Dept 1995] lv denied 86 NY2d 795 [1995]) correctly applied the Court's holding that was adverse to the prosecution.After years of its decision in Stith being ignored, the Court in People v Hunter (2011 NY Slip Op 04542 [6/2/11]) finally reminded courts that they are bound to follow its decision in Stith. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in a case like the 2002 SCOTUS decision in Verizon Md v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:20 pm
The court followed Matter of Settlement Capital Corp v Yates 12 Misc 3d 1198(A) in stating that "fair and reasonable were to be evaluated on a case by case basis and the totality of the circumstances". [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by Jeanne Long
Justice Hathaway concurred in Justice Kelly’s dissent, and wrote separately to emphasize consternation at the Court’s failure to adhere to People v Hunter and to contest the evidence that the pilot program, and predeliberation jury discussions generally, enhance a jury’s ability to reach a fair result   [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by Kevin
Hunter's Lessee, in which the Court informed Virginia that oh yeah, it did so have jurisdiction to hear appeals of state-court decisions on federal issues. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:58 pm by Heidi Meinzer
The statute at the time, Virginia Code Section 3.1-796.122 [currently Code Section 3.2-6570], stated that “[a]ny person who . . . [read post]