Search for: "State v. Hussein" Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 4:28 pm by Martin Downs
Taking that as a starting point, it would appear that it was part of the ratio of the judgment that the Court of Appeal disagreed with the analysis of Andrew Smith J when he dealt with a categorization problem in Hussein v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 1670. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:40 am
Courts have jurisdiction over Iraq in claims involving alleged misdeeds that occurred during Saddam Hussein's regime. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:16 am by Darius Whelan
 In a very important decision yesterday, Hussein v The Labour Court [2012] IEHC 364, Hogan J. found that a migrant worker who had been exploited by his employer could not claim under the working time legislation, minimum wage legislation and the Terms of Employment (Information) legislation. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:12 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Now available in redacted form: the government’s opposition brief and the defendant’s reply in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
Michael Reisman, Babel and BITs: Divergence Analysis and Authentication in the Unusual Decision of Kilic v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
” Saddam Hussein was executed before these charges could be adjudicated).The issue arose in Jones in a somewhat backward fashion. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 8:53 am
The Bush administration has taken an important stand in Medellín v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:25 am by Liam Thornton
.” Hussein v The Labour Court & Anor [2012] IEHC 364 (31 August 2012) at para. 1 (Mr. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:25 am by Liam Thornton
Hussein v The Labour Court & Anor [2012] IEHC 364 (31 August 2012) at para. 1 (Mr. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 3:36 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta and Mohammed Hussein Ali. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am by Kevin
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Both the Bush and Obama administrations construed the 2002 AUMF to provide the domestic legal authority for armed conflict against Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, and for military force against armed militia groups that sought to drive U.S. forces out of Iraq after the regime fell.14 I personally do not believe the 2001 AUMF covers armed conflict against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, or, as some have argued, that the 2002 AUMF for Iraq can be stretched to have justified lethal force… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
Bush administration to go to war with the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. [read post]