Search for: "State v. Improved Parcel of Land"
Results 1 - 20
of 175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 9:10 am
In Lost Tree Village Corporation v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
., v. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 7:57 pm
” In addition, the parcel of land could only accommodate three residential lots with an estimated market value of $30,000 each. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 10:49 am
Moses stated that he relied on his oral agreement with Maxwell that Modern would transfer title to Parcels 380 and 381 when he began improving the land and house on 381. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
Hansen Lost Tree Village Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:58 am
Lebov, LLC v State of New York, 2020 WL 4197130 (NYAD 2 Dept 7/22/2020) [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:15 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court in Murr v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:05 am
Here are the materials in Donato v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:00 pm
Hicks v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:57 pm
The post Will There Finally be Some Development on the Land Condemned in Kelo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Murr v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:18 am
Lepera Contracting Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
In April, the state of Nevada filed an amicus brief that I coauthored on behalf of Nevada itself and eight other state governments in Murr v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:48 pm
The Hardeman family sold 137 acres in Teton County to the Jackson Hole Land Trust (“JHLT”), which divided the property into several parcels. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm
Because the United State Supreme Court just issued its decision in Koontz v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:20 am
By Glen Hansen In Schmidt v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm
See Harbour Properties, Inc v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 am
Dist., 570 U.S. 595 (2013), protections established under both the state and federal constitutions have been expanded to apply in the context of certain land use and zoning decisions requiring local government-imposed exactions or conditions to satisfy the following two (2) legal standards initially articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Nollan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:58 am
Przybylo, the plaintiffs deposited fill and topsoil, dug a trench, installed drainage pipes, and an underground dog fence and a bird house on a disputed parcel of land. [read post]
