Search for: "State v. International Amusements" Results 41 - 60 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm by Eric Goldman
 The New York Court of Appeals stated: “The defendant used the plaintiff’s alleged picture to amuse those who paid to be entertained,” and held that “the name and picture of the plaintiff were used by the defendant as a matter of business and profit and contrary to the prohibition of the statute. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
McDermott – that case later became United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
It then considers the emergence of international standards as they inform regulatory efforts in states and enterprises and as normative standards in their own right. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by Peter Margulies
The Establishment Clause took center stage in Monday’s 10-3 Fourth Circuit decision in International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
Cress, 112 Ohio St.3d 72, 2006-Ohio-6501, ¶ 36, quoting Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2382 (1986) citing State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:28 pm
Thus just as they flouted Resolution 1.10 from the 1998 Lambeth Conference in 2003, when they approved the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Ad Law Defense
Dec. 12, 2016) (Statement of Interest)) and through consent decrees (see Nat’l Fed. of the Blind and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Kenneth Anderson
His wife was also a diplomat (whether from State or DEA or USAID, I don’t recall). [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Today’s opinion in In re United States of America/United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
The last case in this category I want to look at is the Spycatcher trial (HM Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers). [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]