Search for: "State v. International Amusements" Results 141 - 158 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
They also publish books and comic books, produce movies and television shows, and create amusement parks, all of which use the properties as a base for the product. [ 21 ] As a result, Disney is a significant consumer of intellectual properties as well a producer thereof. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Just click here to see the bills for a specific state. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
What was once a measure to avoid police soon became a star-making promotional tool.[4] Starting in 2003, the artist began a series of stunts where he would go to major art museums (such as Tate Britain, the Louvre, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art) in disguise and enter his own art into the collection.[5] Banksy first rose to international infamy in 2005 when he created a series of images in Palestine on the West Bank’s concrete wall. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 5:49 am
These relationships are not restricted to the government, but yes to the whole society, through a set of essential practices for the maintenance of the state. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
Let's look at updates state by state, and then turn to last Thursday's big development in Los Angeles. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin Thompson, at Davis McGrath LLC in Chicago, practices primarily in the area of domestic and international trademarks, copyrights, and internet law issues. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin Thompson, at Davis McGrath LLC in Chicago, practices primarily in the area of domestic and international trademarks, copyrights, and internet law issues. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
As most readers are probably aware, the past few years have seen considerable media and clinical interest in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a progressive, neurodegenerative condition linked to, and thought to result from, concussions, blasts, and other forms of brain injury (including, importantly, repeated but milder sub-concussion-level injuries) that can lead to a variety of mood and cognitive disorders, including depression, suicidality, memory loss, dementia,… [read post]