Search for: "State v. Iona "
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
Iona College (2d Cir. 2006), and its influence on the development of sexual orientation jurisprudence. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:32 am
See Gisel v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Have our views of the goal or purpose of a free state changed over time? [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am
Likewise, the cause of action alleging prima facie tort failed because the plaintiff did not sufficiently plead “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence as the sole motive for the challenged conduct” of the Iona defendants, and failed to sufficiently plead special damages (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Nachbar v Cornwall Yacht Club, 160 AD3d 972, 973-974 [2018]). [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm
In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court faced this question in State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
Commercial NIPT tests available in the UK such as The Harmony Test and the IONA test cost around £350-500 per test. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
19 May 2017, 3:35 am
On 4 May 2017 the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) delivered its judgment in the case Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Kārtības policijas pārvalde v Rīgas pašvaldības SIA ‘Rīgas satiksme’, answering two related questions: ‘(1) Must the phrase ‘is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the … third party or… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm
(Receiver of) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 4:29 pm
Guidance in this area was re-examined with the publication this week of an Opinion by Advocate General (AG) Bobek of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in a case referred for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU by the Latvian Supreme Court: Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Kārtības policijas pārvalde v Rīgas pašvaldības SIA ‘Rīgas satiksme’, Case C-13/16, 26 January 2017. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:31 am
” In the end, the court followed the lead of the Second Circuit’s decision in Holcomb v Iona College addressing interracial association, by interpreting the ordinary meaning of sex under Title VII to include sexual orientation. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
On 4 November, Mr Justice Nicol handed down an anonymised judgment in ERY v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2016] EWHC 2760 (QB)). [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:27 pm
The court stated that, on the facts outlined above, the “basic elements of a good, strong harassment claim [in English law] are present“. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am
In doing so, he referred to the leading authority Proctor v Bailey(1889) 42 Ch 390, which states that “… an injunction is granted for prevention, and where there is no ground for apprehending the repetition of a wrongful act there is no ground for an injunction“. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
They applied to declare unconstitutional the provisions of the Canada Elections Act (CEA) denying the vote to most citizens who had … Iona Contractors Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 11:11 am
In Jeffrey Chiara v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
As some readers may be aware [particularly if they spotted Iona's post on the 1709 Blog, here], the photographer Patrick Cariou brought an action for summary judgment against artist Richard Prince for copyright infringement in 2008 (Cariou v Prince, 784 F. [read post]
