Search for: "State v. Ireland"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
CG v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:40 am
Doe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:53 am
Yesterday’s High Court decision, Doherty v Government of Ireland has resulted in global coverage of the Irish Government’s reluctance to engage with democracy. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 5:37 pm
Contents include: LectureAlexis Mourre, For a Universal Standard for Conflicts Disclosures Case Comments John R Crook, Kimberly-Clark Dutch Holdings, BV, Kimberly-Clark SLU, and Kimberly-Clark BVBA v Venezuela Andrés Mazuera, Glencore v Colombia: A Tale of Legally Coerced Evidence Patrick Leonard, Patrick Costello v the Government of Ireland, Ireland and the Attorney General: Obstacles to the Ratification of CETA in the Irish Constitutional… [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:50 pm
The case is titled United States v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:18 am
The DPC states that the Decision may expose that other US exports to FISA702 electronic communications service providers who “may fall foul of the requirement of Chapter V GDPR “; but that it is not open to the DPC to suspend such transfers generally – each case would have to be assessed and ruled on separately. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:57 am
The case is Facebook Inc. and Facebook Ireland Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 1:41 pm
That section, as originally enacted, applied only to the interception of messages being transmitted by the then state monopoly, Telecom Ãâ [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:42 am
The minority would have remitted their cases to the Secretary of State for further consideration in the light of the judgment. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
Ireland. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:52 pm
Thompson [1982] Q.B. 47 and Grappelli and Anor. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 2:58 pm
IN THE COURTS Northern Ireland Abortion Case The Supreme Court has ruled in R (on the application of A and B) v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:45 am
In McKeogh v Facebook Ireland Limited et al, Record No. 2012/254P, High Court Ireland, May 16 2013, the Irish High Court came up with a novel solution – require the Internet intermediaries, in this case Google and Facebook, to order their experts to meet with the defamed person’s expert to come up with a solution that can be incorporated into a mandatory injunction. [read post]
