Search for: "State v. Irish"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 9:07 pm
” Along with Debs v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 10:34 am
A Recent Judgment on the Irish Workplace Dispute Resolution System In Zalewski v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:01 am
On this day in ...... 1956, via a 1-sentence per curiam order in Board of Trustees v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 10:04 am
Irish-Am. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
The state points to Rumsfeld v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:49 am
The case, entitled Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 8:21 pm
This explains that the obligations that Article 8 of the ECHR implies for the requesting State applied in this case, contrary to what was the case in Povse v Austria, where the incidence of the Brussels IIbis Regulation was at stake. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 3:40 am
Irish-American, Lesbian & Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557 (1995), is among the most often cited in the field. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Third, amidst the usual welter of authorities being discussed, it was particularly interesting to see the Irish cases (Donegan v Dublin CC [2008] IEHC 288; Dublin CC v Gallagher [2008] IEHC 354) being drawn on in this context, although they are a bit of a sideshow. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am
Ct. 1683, 1689 n.2 (2020); see also United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:53 am
This duty lies at the centre of the Irish child care system. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:05 am
” But the position of the United States government in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
The DPC rejected the complaint, so Schrems then appealed in an action before the Irish High Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:15 am
It was confirmed yesterday that the Irish government has withdrawn its appeal to the Supreme Court against the High Court decision of McKechnie J in Foy v An t-Ard Chláraitheoir & Ors. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm
The claimants are of Irish Traveller descent, living in temporary accommodation in Hillingdon. [read post]
