Search for: "State v. Irish" Results 81 - 100 of 1,153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2010, 3:45 am by David Keane
This marked a major elevation in terms of their legal effect in India, in part influenced by the 1951 Indian Supreme Court decision in Madras v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
The Defamation Bill 2006 should have provided an opportunity to consider this issue - but that Bill would not have changed the law in this area had it been enacted.On the libel tourism point, possibly the best Irish example is USA Rugby Football Union Limited v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
The Defamation Bill 2006 should have provided an opportunity to consider this issue - but that Bill would not have changed the law in this area had it been enacted.On the libel tourism point, possibly the best Irish example is USA Rugby Football Union Limited v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:49 am
In his order, handed down in Case T-411/07 R Aer Lingus v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
At the Irish Centre for European Law’s Privacy and Data Protection Conference on 1 July 2016 (programme pdf) in the Royal Irish Academy, many interesting themes were explored. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am by KIRSTEN SJØVOLL, MATRIX
It furthermore held that the authorities of the committees relied upon by the appellants was “slight” as a matter of international law, relying on Jones v Ministry of Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2007] 1 AC 270 at [23]. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Liam Thornton
” The then Chief Justice of the Irish Supreme Court, Ronan Keane, stated (at p. 282) that he had the ‘gravest doubts’ about whether any form of socio-economic rights should ever be ‘discovered’ under Article 40 of the Irish Constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:30 am by Darius
This is in spite of a clear ruling from the European Court of Human Rights in Rakevich v Russia in 2003, where it was stated that "the detainee's access to the judge should not depend on the good will of the detaining authority".The 2001 Act provides that a person may be removed to an approved psychiatric centre by members of staff of the approved centre in certain circumstances (s.13). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Four years ago, I blogged about a dead pregnant woman whose case reached the Irish High Court (PP v Health Service Executive). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 pm by David Hart QC
This odd position was reached in an application by a newspaper group against the Irish state. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:26 pm by Marta Requejo
Thus, the Spanish legislation should only prevail over the parties’ choice of a third-State law, but not over the choice of the law of a Member State. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:51 am by TJ McIntyre
Building on earlier Irish authorities and applying the ECtHR decision in Camenzind v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 1:41 pm
That section, as originally enacted, applied only to the interception of messages being transmitted by the then state monopoly, Telecom Ãâ [read post]