Search for: "State v. Iverson" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 7:00 am by Faiza Patel
In his response earlier this week, Jens Iverson correctly points out that the Chemical Weapons Convention prohibits states parties from “retain[ing]” chemical weapons. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:46 am
Pre-Arbitration Requirements After BG Group v Argentina Anna Joubin-Bret, Spotlight on Third-Party Funding in Investor-State Arbitration Jonathan Ketcheson, The Law 42 Arbitrations: Ecuador’s Efforts to Capture ‘Extraordinary Profits’ of Oil Companies [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:14 pm
It has been focused on states, rather than non-state actors. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
State, 469 N.E.2d 1153, 1157 (Indiana Supreme Court 1984) (referencing Nixon v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals does not agree, and the conviction stands.The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The police found the drugs by accident, and defendant got nailed.The case is United States v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:03 am
During the Indiana primary election Tuesday, Lamar flashed updates on election returns on its digital billboards across the state, Iverson said. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:03 am by admin
In Peugh v United States, SCOTUS ruled federal criminal defendants must be sentenced under the guidelines in effect when the crime took place, not higher guidelines in place when the defendant is sentenced. [read post]