Search for: "State v. Ivory" Results 141 - 160 of 202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 7:00 am by Enchanta Jackson
article=2051. 2 The Official Dark Girls Movie Website: The Story of Color, Gender, and Race, at http://officialdarkgirlsmovie.com/. 3 Interview with Lorena Luna (2011). 4 Cara V. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:23 am by SHG
Instead, the lawsuit builds on a 2003 United States Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by PunditMom
That was the practical upshot of the ruling in the highly-watched case Dukes v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm by Glenn Reynolds
The proposed legislation would formally reinstate that inalienable right of self defense to imagined ivory towers of Tennessee higher education. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
Marshall’s most famous decision — Marbury v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm by Betsy McKenzie
It turns out that California has an unusual state law that makes it illegal to sell lecture or class notes. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
Originalism is not just an ivory tower theory. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:08 am by Carl Folsom
Whether defendant’s criminal history must be proved to a jury (Ivory issue).State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:27 pm by Gideon
In essence the dissent, penned by now-retired Justice Vertefeuille (who also penned the shockingly bold State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Kurt Schulzke
With today’s SCOTUS decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:22 pm
City of Chicago and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Carl Folsom
Ivory issue (whether use of criminal history to increase sentence violated Apprendi)State v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 pm by Nathan
It doesn’t direct policy from an ivory tower built on the bedrock of hard data. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:50 am by Carl Folsom
Ivory issue (applying Apprendi to facts of criminal history)State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]