Search for: "State v. Jameson" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
”The difficulty here is that many states, having refused to legislate in favour of text and data-mining, are presumably not convinced of their merit. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
He specifically addressed our ability to address the two major strategic threats facing the United States: a rising China and weak, malevolent states. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:58 am by Ronald Mann
An uncharacteristically amenable Court heard argument on Tuesday in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
(The title , which I have used in various forms before, recalls J Jonah Jameson, the irascible boss of Peter Parker aka SpiderMan whom JJJ of course famously detested. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Abstract: This essay reads the public controversy surrounding Sonja Sotomayor’s nomination and confirmation to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:12 pm by Jeff Gamso
As of 3:58 Eastern Time, the docket doesn't reflect the freeing, though it does recount the January 5 date.John Kindley at People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:45 am
People v Jameson, 1091, 6630/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 6774; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:44 pm
From South Dakota Watch and Epp Law Report:Letting Lawyers See Inmates: Another State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:51 pm
But love 'em or hate 'em, you've got to admire footnote 1 in CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]