Search for: "State v. Jeffries" Results 61 - 80 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
It alleges that during the class period the defendants misled these investors by making false or misleading statement or failing to disclose that   (i) Barclays engaged in a “systematic pattern of fraud and deceit” by using its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders over its other clients; (ii) the pools were promoted as offering investors protection from predatory traders, while Barclays instead courted HFT firms by charging them lower rates; (iii) Barclays falsely understated… [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
When viewed in the light most favorable to the state, the court says the evidence is adequate. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Siemenski: we don’t really know because there are too few cases, because of the great imbalance of power between those sending the notices and those receiving them—big corporations v. individual users.Coble for Bridy: should Congress create incentives for voluntary systems to address infringement, and if so what? [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:24 am by Kim Krawiec
         A case kicking around back them was United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:30 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Thomas Ashton Leon DeBauche has posted Bursting Bottles: Doubting the Objective-Only Approach to 18 U.S.C. 875(C) in Light of United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
”  Brief for the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
In an interview with Professor Jeffries in 1991 for the biography, Powell said he would change his vote in McCleskey v. [read post]