Search for: "State v. Jepsen"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 2:47 pm
This comes from a Jepsen press release: HARTFORD – George Jepsen, Democratic candidate for Attorney General, said he is confident the state election for attorney general will move forward as scheduled Nov. 2 with his name firmly on the ballot, despite the “desperate” lawsuit filed by his Republican opponent Martha Dean. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm
The Bysiewicz case is different from Jepsen v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:48 pm
The High Court released four opinions today, including this one in American Electric Power v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:40 am
Jepsen, decided on September 4. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:39 am
George Jepsen, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Case No. 3:15cv01731(RAR). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
George Jepsen, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Case No. 3:15cv01731(RAR). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
Jepsen. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:43 pm
Also in Connecticut, former state Democratic Party Chairman George Jepsen has declared victory in the race to replace Blumenthal as AG. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:33 pm
In Savings Bank v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:39 pm
According to Connecticut’s Attorney General, George Jepsen, this change would only set “a floor for the duration of the protection” and his office may continue to “seek broader kinds of protection,” reports the Hartford Courant. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
Rakusen v Jepsen and others [2023] UKSC 9, where the Court will determine whether a Rent Repayment Order can only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/plq3gzTcnD -> Costs order in Warman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
While it had been difficult for the UT to provide guidance on awards, it was clear that “the purpose of the repayment regime is not compensatory (an unlicensed HMO may be a perfectly satisfactory place to live)” (as per Rakusen v Jepsen (2020) UKUT 298 (LC) ). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Koontz v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
The Upper Tribunal followed Rakusen v Jepsen (2020) UKUT 298 (LC), found that the landlord had committed the offence under section 72(1) of the Housing Act 2004 and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:39 am
Loan Payment Administration LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:08 am
PSEG Long Island LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:17 am
My best guess is that this is preparatory to regulations that will address ‘rent to rent’ set ups, after Rakusen v Jepsen. [read post]
