Search for: "State v. Ji " Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  On 17 May 2010 Mr Justice Eady stayed the action on the ground that it would involve an illegitimate inquiry into issues of religious doctrine (HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group & Anor [2010] EWHC 1294 (QB)). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:07 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Trust Breach; Osage Headrights) Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm by INFORRM
   Meanwhile, Mr Justice Eady was ordering a stay in the claim of His Holiness Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Singh (see the news report here). [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:31 pm by NARF
Haaland (Evictions) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:39 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
On Climate Change Policy Objectives and Compliance with Investment Agreements Laura Létourneau Tremblay, In Need of a Paradigm Shift: Reimagining Eco Oro v Colombia in Light of New Treaty Language Ji Ma, Moving from the Brown Economy to the Green Economy: The Battle over International Intellectual Property Matteo Fermeglia, Cashing-In on the Energy Transition? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am by Anita Davies, Matrix
The Gurdwaras were held under a trust established in 1991 to administer them according to the teachings of the “first holy saint” (Sant Maharaj Baba Gian Sing Ji). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:30 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Diego Mejía-Lemos, The suitability of investor-State dispute settlement and host State counterclaims for implementing climate change international responsibility Ji Ma, Bridging multinational corporations' investment-climate gap: Prospects for the direct claims approach Oliver Hailes, Unjust enrichment in investor–State arbitration: A principled limit on compensation for future income from fossil fuels Case NoteTadesse M. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm by CoL .net
The application and reiteration of which was recently seen in Enka v Chubb and Kabab-ji v Kout Food Group. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:17 am by Steven M. Gursten
This will require the M Civil JI 36.11 definition of objectively manifested to now be changed as well. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Ji Sun Jennifer Kim v Goldberg, Weprin, Finkel, Goldstein, LLP, 120 AD3d 18, the Appellate Division opined that Plaintiff's complaint failed to state a cause of action for hostile work environment under New York City's City Human Rights Law* because it does not allege that Defendants' actions occurred under circumstances that gave rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Ji Sun Jennifer Kim v Goldberg, Weprin, Finkel, Goldstein, LLP, 120 AD3d 18, the Appellate Division opined that Plaintiff's complaint failed to state a cause of action for hostile work environment under New York City's City Human Rights Law* because it does not allege that Defendants' actions occurred under circumstances that gave rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]