Search for: "State v. Jodie A."
Results 21 - 40
of 315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
Supreme Court’s American Electric Power v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:06 am
The decision is Gamboa v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:48 am
Mark V. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
"The decision is Ciszewski v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
However, the court stated that if the investor could fashion the claim to circumvent SLUSA preemption, a claim for restitution of the fees paid the company could be recovered as restitution.The March 8 decision is Smit v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm
The decision is Martin v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:09 am
The decision is City of Memphis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:57 am
The decision in Fink v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:51 am
The decision is Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:01 am
The decision is Curtis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:21 pm
T-Mobile Awarded Injunction, Damages for Competitor's Violation of Unfair Competition Law This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:02 am
Court of Appeals in New York City has held (Steiner v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:52 am
Whirlpool Corp. appears at CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,254.Further details regarding CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law appear here. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:16 pm
The complaint lacked any explanation of the role that the payor played as a purchaser of Nexium.The decision is Pennsylvania Employee Benefit Trust Fund v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:11 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,301. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:35 am
Jody CoultasCCHThe Patent Trial and Appeal Board did not err in finding that certain claims of Slot Speaker Technologies, Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:49 pm
The decision is Degelmann v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
Jody Freeman (Harvard Law School) and Adrian Vermeule (Harvard Law School) have posted “Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:13 am
Marketing for "Phased Out" Cell Phone Could Violate California Unfair Competition LawThis posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.Wireless telephone subscribers stated California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) claims against AT&T, based on the company's marketing and sale of a premium cell phone that it was allegedly in the process of phasing out, according to a… [read post]
