Search for: "State v. Joseph Kennedy" Results 101 - 120 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Kennedy, a pivotal vote whose future on the bench is a matter of intense speculation. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern suggests that Justice Elena Kagan’s majority opinion in Lucia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, a cert petition asserting that the state failed to comply in a murder case with its obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence under Brady v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:11 am by NCC Staff
The only Senator who later objected to the Brennan nomination was Joseph McCarthy. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:25 pm by Ilya Somin
As prominent nineteenth century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story explained in Martin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Bork’s opponents were critical of his opinions about the Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary on Whitford comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by The Federalist Society
  And now, to discuss the cases, we have Joseph Tartakovsy, Deputy Solicitor General for the State of Nevada. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Bobby Scott (D-Va.) and Joseph Kennedy (D-Mass.) accordingly have introduced the “Do No Harm Act” again this year. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:20 pm by Bill Otis
  If we are to have an effective death penalty, as the Supreme Court has said the Constitution allows (Glossip v. [read post]