Search for: "State v. Kaufman" Results 41 - 60 of 362
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2022, 5:28 am by Just Security
by Iris Malone (@irisemalone) Technology Policy A Quantum Sputnik Moment by Nima Leclerc Surveillance and Reproductive Rights With Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
President, to fulfill a priority you, your administration, and Congress have repeatedly stated of bringing home our American hostages still held in Iran,” the families wrote in a letter delivered Tuesday. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
  While this pre-suit demand requirement is not quite as rigorous as the pre-suit demand requirement for derivative actions (see Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113 [1st Dept 2003]), at least a general allegation of a prior demand and refusal is required. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The breach of fiduciary duty cause of action based on defendants’ retention of the funds held in escrow must be dismissed as duplicative of the breach of contract cause of action (see William Kaufman Org. v Graham & James, 269 AD2d 171, 173 [1st Dept 2000]). [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Claim handlers continue to wrestle with enduring long-tail Exchange Act claims, federal and state Securities Act claims, and shareholder derivative suits without respite. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:38 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
In the case […] The post State of limitations on biometric data privacy claims in Illinois clarified, Biometric Update.com, featuring Stefan Dandelles, Jean Liu, Sept 20, 2021 appeared first on Kaufman Dolowich Voluck LLP. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:38 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Claims relating to informed consent, data retention policy disclosure and safeguarding are subject to a five-year limit, while claims based on unlawful profit or disclosure have only a one-year time limit, the judges ruled in the case of Tims v. [read post]