Search for: "State v. Kearns" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Of course Kearns did not concern publication by a public body, but the judge thought that if there was a contradiction between Kearns and Wood he would be bound to follow Wood. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:14 am by Yvonne Daly
Kearns P. noted that there was a “manifest need” for effective measures to regulate the entry into the State of undocumented non-Irish nationals and declined to deem s.12 a disproportionate measure. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In Kearns v General Council of the Bar ([2003] 1 WLR 1357), the Bar Council had published a seriously defamatory statement circulated to all heads of chambers, senior clerks and practice managers in England and Wales. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:06 am by Robin Shea
Department of Labor, by a group of 21 states, and the other, Chamber of Commerce of Plano v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:53 am by Aoife O'Donoghue
Yesterday’s High Court decision, Doherty v Government of Ireland has resulted in global coverage of the Irish Government’s reluctance to engage with democracy. [read post]