Search for: "State v. Kilby" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2016, 8:26 pm
On April 4, 2016, the California Supreme Court answered three questions certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding interpretation of the California wage order requirements for the provision of seating to employees (previously covered on the ILJ here). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:23 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Two other appeals were pending before the Ninth Circuit at the time that dealt with similar issues, one of which was Kilby v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
On Thursday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion in Hohlbein v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:51 am
& Anor> [2007] EWCA Civ 475 (23 May 2007) Secretary of State for the Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs v Bancoult R. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:44 am by Dustin Carlton
  This so-called “holistic approach” was, however, rejected by the California Supreme Court in Kilby v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:29 pm by Jeffrey D. Polsky
The Ninth Circuit asked the California Supreme Court for clarification, the California Supreme Court asked the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (“DLSE”) to weigh in, and now the issue is back with the California Supreme Court, which heard oral argument yesterday in Kilby v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm by Simon Gibbs
  Although Lamont v Burton [2007] EWCA Civ 429 and Kilby v Gawith EWCA Civ 812 are authority for the proposition that the courts have no discretion as to whether to allow fixed success fees, does this extend as far as overriding the disclosure or notification requirements? [read post]