Search for: "State v. Kittredge"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Each passing year brings more appellate court decisions, at the state and federal levels, addressing arbitration. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Each passing year brings more appellate court decisions, at the state and federal levels, addressing arbitration. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:37 am
CJH Harleysville Group Ins. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
" (citation omitted)];Matter of Kittredge v Planning Bd. of Town of Liberty, 57 AD3d 1336, 1339 [2008] ["In construing a statute, a court must attempt to harmonize all its provisions and to give meaning to all its parts, considered as a whole, in accord with legislative intent. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
(How they succeeded in pulling off that strategy will be the subject of my following post.)For ECUSA and its attorneys, the world of church property law began and ended with Watson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Like Justices Toal and Kittredge, and following Waccamaw, he thinks that the Dennis Canon does not, in and of itself, function to create a legally cognizable trust on parish property within the State of South Carolina. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm
South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, November 12, 2014, Kittredge, J.). [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 2:07 pm
With the August 26, 2015 Supreme Court opinion in McKinney v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
Pleicones]), no other Justice does so, and two dissenting Justices (Toal and Kittredge) argue that the standard of review is "one at law", not equity (Opinions, pp. 55-57, and 39 at n. 31).For his part, Chief Justice Beatty in his opinion makes absolutely no mention of the standard of review which he thinks applies to the case, although he states that he "disagree[s] with the analysis of the majority" (Opinions at 36; emphasis added), so… [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
Pleicones]), no other Justice does so, and two dissenting Justices (Toal and Kittredge) argue that the standard of review is "one at law", not equity (Opinions, pp. 55-57, and 39 at n. 31).For his part, Chief Justice Beatty in his opinion makes absolutely no mention of the standard of review which he thinks applies to the case, although he states that he "disagree[s] with the analysis of the majority" (Opinions at 36; emphasis added), so… [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
I know that much time went into this release, including many hours over at least one very taxing weekend put in by Melissa Roverts Harke, Robert Holowka, Sirimal Mukerjee, Adele Kittredge Murray, Neema Nassiri-Motlagh, Jill Pritzker, David Stevens, Thomas Strumpf, Sarah ten Siethoff, and Samuel K. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:05 am
" The idea behind the 'Great v. [read post]
