Search for: "State v. Ko"
Results 1 - 20
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 8:43 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
To do so, the court employed the three-part test developed by the United States Supreme Court in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
The FTT allowed KO’s appeal but UTJ Southern reversed the decision by holding that it would not be “unduly harsh” if the children stayed in the UK with their mother upon KO’s deportation. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:10 am
As regards the specific cases, in KO the Supreme Court concluded that the Upper Tribunal judge was wrong to decide that he should take account of the criminality of the parent in applying the “unduly harsh” test but that his overall conclusion was correct. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:44 pm
Korn v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 7:27 pm
There is an excellent description of the trial testimony to date in the Schroer case, now on trial before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Nyazee, The Probable Islamic State of the Future, (October 21, 2023).Mark Satta, 303 Creative v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
The correct approach is to follow the guidance which was stated to be “authoritative” in KO (Nigeria), namely the direction in the Upper Tribunal case of MK (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] INLR 563 (“MK”). [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:30 am
Supreme Court Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd [2012] UKSC 17 (2 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2012] EWCA Civ 501 (02 May 2012) ConvaTec Ltd & Ors v Smith & Nephew Healthcare Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 520 (02 May 2012) Kizhakudan v Secretary of State for Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 566 (02 May 2012) Birmingham City Council v Akhtar & Ors [2012]… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:03 am
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF LB, BO, KO, Minors, STATE OF WYOMING, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:13 am
You should state and defend your view. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
In Case of Medzlis Islamske Zajednice Brcko and Others v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:00 am
Cos did not help her financially.The Tenth Circuit applied United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:39 pm
(Originally posted on Daily Kos.) [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Ko`olau pali at Kane`ohe Bay (koolaupokohcc.org) In its recent decision in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
