Search for: "State v. Kopf"
Results 81 - 100
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 1:59 am
” However, in 2010, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in the case of Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
In 2010, in Schalk & Kopf v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
Gas and Dubois v France (2012) (application no 25951/07). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:08 am
See Fox v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
In Haley v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:37 am
Judge Kopf also dismissed state tortious interference with contract claims on state sovereign immunity grounds. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In that respect, as was explained in a previous post, the in the recent case of Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights decided that at this point in time, Article 12 does not require States to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:40 pm
A five judge panel of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has decided not to allow a full hearing take place in relation to the case of Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:08 am
Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm
It doesn't get much stronger than an actual condition for admission to the Council of Europe.- Also, in Schalk and Kopf v Austria (para 61), the Court abandoned previous case-law to the effect that a marriage within the meaning of Article 12 could only ever exist between a man and a woman. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:22 am
The decision in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:15 pm
J M v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:32 am
On 24 June, in Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the court decided that the convention does not yet require equal access. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
It is unlikely that judges here can be relied upon to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
Meanwhile, over in Strasbourg… A complaint of a very different type of discrimination, the refusal of a European Convention state to allow same-sex couples to marry, was recently decided by the Strasbourg Court in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:20 am
The debate on conscience exemption, and its swift dismissal, reflects the changing relationship between Church and State in Ireland, and the waning influence of religion in matters of gender, sexuality and family.The passing of the Civil Partnership Bill follows on from the judgment that a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (left) rendered on June 24th in Schalk and Kopf v Austria.The applicants had complained that the absence of same-sex marriage in Austria… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:13 pm
What the Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 6:50 pm
has a nice discussion of a recent European Court of Human Rights Chamber decision (Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
